Workable solution
EDITOR: In a letter published Oct. 26, Chuck Sher disparaged Ariel Sharon
for his hatred and violence, and called for ''a just and peaceful'' (but
undefined) solution to the Palestinian problem. Before defining the nature of
such a solution, two fundamental questions must be addressed:
* Why did Yasser Arafat engineer the election of Sharon over Ehud Barak by
walking out of the Camp David meeting with former President Bill Clinton, and
responding with violence to an offer of a Palestinian state and other
concessions instead of negotiating on the several unresolved issues?
* With whom do the Israelis negotiate peace, in the face of the Hamas (and
several other terrorist organizations) stated resolve and actions to scuttle
any attempt at peace negotiations?
There are two solutions that will work, and perhaps a third. Workable
solutions consist either of all Israelis converting to Islam, or just to
disappear. The potential third solution is for Israel to come under
Palestinian rule, but whether this would ultimately be peaceful is
problematical. Which solution do you prefer, Mr. Sher?
LAWRENCE SHAPIRO
Sebastopol
Irrelevant state?
EDITOR: I want to take this opportunity, the day following the elections of
November 2002, to extend my sincere congratulations to The Press Democrat and
those who blindly followed your voting recommendations on the election returns
from the great state of California.
It will be well noted in the months to come when the tax rates in this
state and the bond rates that will be issued to cover the tremendous deficit
go higher than anytime in our history. Then the Democrats will try to obtain
assistance in Washington, D.C., only to find that our state is irrelevant,
isolated, impotent and broke. God bless all those on fixed incomes.
Congratulations to all.
DONALD B. LEE
Santa Rosa
March for peace
EDITOR: On Oct. 26, my family participated along with some 80,000 other
citizens of this great and powerful nation, in a march and rally in San
Francisco. Our purpose? To stop the insanity of our great and powerful nation
which is heading toward an invasion of Iraq. This demonstration was one of
many that occurred simultaneously throughout the world. In Washington D.C.,
Maine, New Mexico, Berlin, London and Asia, just to mention a few. These
demonstrations are essential not only in terms of people in the street but
almost more importantly in the media that report them. The will of the people
must be heard and not marginalized by photos of wild-looking people.
On Sunday in Santa Rosa we will let everyone know that we are against any
military incursion into Iraq. Gather on the front lawn of Santa Rosa Junior
College (1501 Mendocino Ave.). The march starts at noon and marches to
Courthouse Square (Fourth and Mendocino) for a rally at 1:30 p.m. Come with
your family, kids; come as a contingent with your church, etc. Bring signs,
banners, drums. March for peace with justice.
ROBIN LATHAM-PONNECK
Sebastopol
Sad about Crushers
EDITOR: I was really sad when my dad told me that the Crushers were leaving
Sonoma County. It was more sad than when the Giants lost the World Series. I
hope the Crushers come back.
ALISON WENDLER, age 7
Santa Rosa
Blind greed
EDITOR: As a resident of Rincon Valley, I am appalled that the voice of our
community is that of the status quo and blind greed. Measure J would have
raised property taxes by only $35 per $100,000 of assessed value, yet the
voters turned it away. These are the same voters whose property values have
skyrocketed in the last five years while the ''assessed'' value of their home
has remained the same.
Rincon Valley homeowners have seen their home values rise to record heights
due to the excellence of Rincon Valley schools and general quality of life,
yet somehow they are too ignorant to make the connection: Better schools
equals higher real estate values. You just cost yourself better schools and
higher home values.
JAY TAKACS
Santa Rosa
What is answer?
EDITOR: Paul Gullixson sure hit the nail on the head with his observation
that ''elected officials haven't shown themselves to be the best stewards of
public funds.'' He is also on the mark to doubt whether the public will do a
better job using ballot propositions to control public funds.
But what is the answer? Are we to throw our hands up in the air and wail?
The Libertarian answer is to reduce public funds by leaving them in the
hands of individuals -- the taxpayers. Let them decide how to spend their own
money.
By and large, they will do a good job of spending their own money, even if
mistakes are occasionally made. Please note that these mistakes hurt only the
spender, not the public. Contrast that with government spending where everyone
is hurt when mistakes are made.
Just look at the energy crisis where the government not only paid 30 times
the normal rate for energy, but they required utility companies to do the
same. No sane individual would have made such a stupid decision.
It has been said that ''the public purse is not safe while the Legislature
is in session.'' If we are not willing to get rid of the Legislature, the
least we can do is reduce the size of the public purse.
JAMES R. OGLESBY
Cloverdale
Single driver
EDITOR: Regarding the story ''Commuters get first crack at new Highway 101
lanes today.''
Let's see if I have this straight:
I don't have any children, so I haven't contributed to the traffic
congestion. Yet my tax money was being used to build extra highway lanes that
I, as a single driver, won't be allowed to use during commute hours.
Can you say taxation without representation?
DAVE BARRY
Santa Rosa
Anti-litter campaign
EDITOR: I had several occasions recently to drive from Healdsburg to
Guerneville, choosing scenic Eastside Road to connect to River Road. Alas, the
closer I got to River Road, the more litter and debris I observed, including
cardboard boxes, a large carpet remnant, and an abandoned car at the
intersection of Eastside and Trenton Healdsburg roads. Eastside leading up to
the intersection of Wohler Road is especially popular with libation consumers,
considering all the discarded beverage containers.
As a teen-ager in the 1960s, anti-litter messages were drilled into me,
including Lady Bird Johnson's ''Beautification of America'' program and the
''crying Indian'' TV commercial. Considering the retro effort by Madison
Avenue lately, maybe it's time to revisit an anti-litter campaign.
BRIAN K. HALEY
Healdsburg
UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy: